On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 04:13:02 GMT, "
wrote:
If I remember correctly

Hi Art,

No notes? No model? No data?

But I must point out that nobody
accepted my theoretical analysis regarding the phase/ current magnitude

What theory? You simply described a trivial draughting exercise.

My only
disapointment was that none came forward to point out the flaw or just
assumed without mathematical reason that it must be flawed.

Let's see, I gave you the rationale that supported your results, I
named the mathematical curve, and then pointed out the necessary
premise to arrive at the results.

Yet at the same time many are anxious to find out how I managed
to lower the TOA. even in the face of presumed flawed analysis.
Weird. very weird yet again none declared it impossible

This is more flawed remembrance.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

All understood so now we can put the thread aside
Art
"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 04:13:02 GMT, "
wrote:
If I remember correctly

Hi Art,

No notes? No model? No data?

But I must point out that nobody
accepted my theoretical analysis regarding the phase/ current magnitude

What theory? You simply described a trivial draughting exercise.

My only
disapointment was that none came forward to point out the flaw or just
assumed without mathematical reason that it must be flawed.

Let's see, I gave you the rationale that supported your results, I
named the mathematical curve, and then pointed out the necessary
premise to arrive at the results.

Yet at the same time many are anxious to find out how I managed
to lower the TOA. even in the face of presumed flawed analysis.
Weird. very weird yet again none declared it impossible

This is more flawed remembrance.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC