| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
The point is that W9UCW measured, that difference in "normal" loading coil (not long coils or helicals) is in order of 40 to 60% less at the top of the coil. All explained by the different phasing of the forward and reflected currents at that point. If you want to blow Tom's mind, measure the current in and out of a coil placed 1/3 of the distance up in a 1/2WL vertical. The current will *INCREASE* from the bottom of the coil to the top of the coil. How many times have we been warned not to use lumped circuit theory on distributed networks? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||