Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you Cecil and Fred!
(Where is Roy? We could use expert guidance in modeling the case.) I will post your comments on eHam.net. The analogy using stubs is excellent. That brings the question of using nice coils, vs. stubs, vs. toroids in shortened antennas. But we will save that for another thread with proper name. Now watch for W8JI twisting into: "I said that all along" see him changing his web page and become a guru who "discovered" that current accross the loading coil in the antenna is significantly different and Yuri (et al) will remain the idiot who can't get the things right :-).... Happened many times before :-( Thanks again! Yuri, K3BU/m As Ken, K7GCO keeps saying: "Don't they get tired of being wrong?" |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |