Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 3rd 03, 05:18 AM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I use lumped circuit analysis when dealing with lumped circuits, and
distributed circuit analysis when dealing with distributed circuits.
EZNEC's loads are lumped elements, so when you're talking about EZNEC
loads, you're talking about lumped elements.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Cecil Moore wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:

Of course it doesn't account for phase shifts of current, since there
aren't any. It does account for voltage phase shift. It uses the same
equations I learned in freshman circuits class. Perhaps they taught
those same equations in Texas, too, but I can't be sure.



Roy,
We are talking about distributed networks. Of course, there is a phase
shift in the current as well as the voltage. You and W8JI seem to be
using lumped circuit analysis when you should be using distributed
network analysis. The center loading coil for a 75m mobile antenna
is an appreciable percentage of an electrical wavelength so you cannot
use your lumped circuit analysis without introducing errors.


  #2   Report Post  
Old November 3rd 03, 06:32 PM
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Roy Lewallen wrote:

I use lumped circuit analysis when dealing with lumped circuits, and
distributed circuit analysis when dealing with distributed circuits.
EZNEC's loads are lumped elements, so when you're talking about EZNEC
loads, you're talking about lumped elements.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL


Hi Roy,

Wouldn't it be better not to lump any portions of an antenna that are a
part of its electrical length?

73, Jim AC6XG
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 3rd 03, 08:34 PM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes. If any real component has signficant length, it's best to model it
as wires if possible. If it's not possible or practical to model it as
wires, about the best you can do is as I've suggested befo model it
as a wire of the length and diameter of the component, and insert one or
more loads to represent the low frequency impedance of the component.
That's about as good as you can do with the limited set of modeling
objects you have.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Jim Kelley wrote:

Roy Lewallen wrote:

I use lumped circuit analysis when dealing with lumped circuits, and
distributed circuit analysis when dealing with distributed circuits.
EZNEC's loads are lumped elements, so when you're talking about EZNEC
loads, you're talking about lumped elements.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL



Hi Roy,

Wouldn't it be better not to lump any portions of an antenna that are a
part of its electrical length?

73, Jim AC6XG


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Smith Chart Quiz Radio913 Antenna 315 October 21st 03 05:31 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 02:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017