Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Roy Lewallen wrote:
If you could build an antenna from straight conductors and lumped inductors, the result would be very close to EZNEC's predictions. Hard to prove since lumped inductors are impossible in reality. Why does EZNEC show so much difference between lumped inductors and stub inductors? The difference in coils Vs stubs in reality is virtually nill. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |