Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good. And I see from your other response that you understand the question.
So now we have a simple series circuit consisting of a generator, the loading inductor, and the R + L or C we used to substitute for the antenna. And your "no" response indicates you've agreed that the voltage across and current through the inductor are the same as when it was connected to the antenna. Now, choose any values you'd like for the generator voltage or current and the component values, and write the equations showing that the current into the inductor is different in any way (amplitude or phase) from the current going out. Or, if that's too taxing, I'll choose some values for you. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Cecil Moore wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: So, was that a yes or a no? I have trouble with your accent. It's a no. Lumped inductors are not conscious of anything including their locations. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |