LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old November 3rd 03, 11:10 PM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Good. And I see from your other response that you understand the question.

So now we have a simple series circuit consisting of a generator, the
loading inductor, and the R + L or C we used to substitute for the
antenna. And your "no" response indicates you've agreed that the voltage
across and current through the inductor are the same as when it was
connected to the antenna.

Now, choose any values you'd like for the generator voltage or current
and the component values, and write the equations showing that the
current into the inductor is different in any way (amplitude or phase)
from the current going out. Or, if that's too taxing, I'll choose some
values for you.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Cecil Moore wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:

So, was that a yes or a no? I have trouble with your accent.



It's a no. Lumped inductors are not conscious of anything
including their locations.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Smith Chart Quiz Radio913 Antenna 315 October 21st 03 05:31 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 02:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017