Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you referring to something you emailed me? If so, I haven't received
it. I'll be glad to look at it when I do. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Cecil Moore wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: Because you're seeing different currents at the two stub terminals, you must be modeling it with wires, which should reflect reality quite well. Look carefully at the currents along the stub and you'll find they're not equal and opposite on the two conductors. Such a radiating stub *is* very different from a coil. Instead of a knee-jerk defense of your ideas, why don't you actually take a look at the problem? Those stubs are vertical. EZNEC shows virtually zero vertically polarized radiation. According to EZNEC, those stubs are radiating a negligible amount, just like the lumped inductance. Why the 40% difference in current between the two configurations? Is this a characteristic of NEC? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |