Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
To assume a short-circuited, sideways protuding stub line, intended to
replace a loading coil, will give the same results as the coil it replaces is unbelievable STUPIDITY. EZNEC will quite correctly treat the stub line as an essential part of the radiating system, itself much longer than the overall height of the short vertical antenna it is supposed to be loading. In fact, the length of wire in the stub line needed to resonate the antenna, plus the height of the antenna, will be of the same order as a full size quarter-wave vertical. Roy, you are wasting your time trying to educate such baffle-gabbing old wives. I make this comment because you are a much too polite gentleman (approaching the English variety) to send them packing yourself with tails between their legs. And I've just finished a glass of South African red. Yelp, yelp! Can you hear them fading into the distance? ;o) ;o) ;o) --- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |