LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old November 4th 03, 12:18 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To assume a short-circuited, sideways protuding stub line, intended to
replace a loading coil, will give the same results as the coil it replaces
is unbelievable STUPIDITY.

EZNEC will quite correctly treat the stub line as an essential part of the
radiating system, itself much longer than the overall height of the short
vertical antenna it is supposed to be loading.

In fact, the length of wire in the stub line needed to resonate the antenna,
plus the height of the antenna, will be of the same order as a full size
quarter-wave vertical.

Roy, you are wasting your time trying to educate such baffle-gabbing old
wives. I make this comment because you are a much too polite gentleman
(approaching the English variety) to send them packing yourself with tails
between their legs. And I've just finished a glass of South African red.

Yelp, yelp! Can you hear them fading into the distance? ;o) ;o) ;o)
---
Reg.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Smith Chart Quiz Radio913 Antenna 315 October 21st 03 05:31 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 02:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017