| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roy Lewallen wrote:
So now we have a simple series circuit consisting of a generator, the loading inductor, and the R + L or C we used to substitute for the antenna. No we don't, Roy. You cannot be allowed, once again, to get away with turning a distributed network problem into a lumped circuit problem. If you can prove me wrong with a distributed network analysis, I will be the first to admit my mistake. If you cannot prove me wrong with a distributed circuit analysis, that's a big clue. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||