Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Assume the box is non-conducting. There would be a current difference
between the two terminals unless you shrunk the length of antenna it contains to a vanishingly small length. In the context of the antenna, even a few feet of an antenna is a significant fraction of a wavelength. Put the box around a few feet of a power transmission line carrying 60 Hz current, and you won't be able to measure any difference between the current going in and coming out. In that situation, a few feet isn't a significant part of a wavelength. If you use a conducting box, you'll end up with current on the outside of the box that gets into the problem. Its value depends on coupling to the wire inside and to the antenna outside, so it gets stickier than I want to deal with. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Jim Kelley wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: Read again the fourth sentence of the posting you quoted. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Jim Kelley wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: If that two-terminal box contains an inductor, then the current out has to equal the current in -- that's the only way the sum of currents at the two terminals can sum to zero. What if you draw a two terminal black box around the middle few feet of a 1/4 wave vertical? What makes the current become the same at both ends? 73, Jim AC6XG Okay. I read it. I'll try asking the question another way. What if you draw a two terminal black box around the middle few feet of a 1/4 wave vertical? What makes the sum of the currents at both ends become equal to zero? 73, Jim AC6XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |