Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the very cogent and informative posting, as yours always are.
One thing you said really rang a bell, and made me consider something I'd never thought much about before. If a coil is radiating significantly, the Q will of course be necessarily poor due to the energy "lost" by radiation. Yet this "loss" won't be detrimental to the antenna performance. Tom Rauch has pointed out that loading inductor loss is very often insignificant compared to ground loss in a typical HF mobile system. Maybe the presumed "loss" of some coils is not as bad as it appears in other antenna applications, either. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Ian White, G3SEK wrote: . . . This brings us back to the question of practical loading coils, and how much radiation (and therefore current variation along the length) we can expect. I haven't ever tried to work it out, but my guess is that a fairly short "square" coil that has been optimized for high Q is not going to radiate much, and that we therefore shouldn't expect a large difference in current between its two ends. . . . |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |