Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ian White, G3SEK" wrote:
The discussion has had to take a step back, because we quickly discovered that there isn't agreement about the properties of an idealized lumped inductor. There's been some blustery speculation about that, but I think the issue is more whether or not an idealized inductor can actually tell us the whole story. It doesn't seem to. Without that shared fundamental understanding of what "the lumped model" is, it's hopeless to discuss whether or not that model is accurate for a practical coil. Perhaps so. I haven't seen anyone actually share their fundamental understanding of the model with the group yet. 73, Jim AC6XG |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
There's been some blustery speculation about that, but I think the issue is more whether or not an idealized inductor can actually tell us the whole story. It doesn't seem to. If a loading coil has no effect on the current or the electrical length of the antenna, exactly what effect does it have? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
If a loading coil has no effect on the current or the electrical length of the antenna, exactly what effect does it have? Apparently the correct answer is "loading". 73, Jim AC6XG |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |