Richard Clark wrote:
You are now removing the frog's legs to prove it is deaf?

Cricket's leg, Richard, cricket's leg.

Still waiting for you to
1.) provide a complete specification of the
a.) radiator
b.) solenoid
c.) ground
d.) drive applied (not readings)
2.) respond to the model offered;
3.) describe the errors possibly attending all this heat.

Too bad you don't hold the other side to the same standards.
One wonders why. Others asserted the positive premise. Why
is it not up to them to prove their assertions? Why is it
up to Yuri to disprove the positive assertions by others that
triggered this entire discussion? You're not prejudiced, are you?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----