Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I won't believe your theory, Yuri, until you and Cecil take the time to present it in terms of field theory. Since you guys have taken EM classes in college you should have no trouble doing this, right? Please reference Chapter 1 of _Fields_and_Waves_... by Ramo, Whinnery, and Van Duzer. Start with equations 1.18 (4)&(5) and 1.22 (1) & (2). Also _Antenna_Theory_ by Balanis, equations 4-81 and 10-1 and one other that I cannot locate right now. :-) The one I cannot locate is the simplified one for a 1/2WL dipole. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp I don't have Ramo et al's book, but I do have Balanis' book. I think anyone who wants to understand equation 4-81 should read the whole section: 4.5.6 where he makes it clear these equations are approximations that are pretty good under some circumstances and lousy under others. The standards he judges them on are the techniques of Integral Equations and Moment Method which he explains in another part of the book. He doesn't say a single thing about a "cosine law" for a real antenna, as Yuri does. I think I'll keep my EZNEC. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH (P.S. I looked, in Balanis, for a section on inductively loaded antennas and couldn't find one. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist. If anyone knows where to look in that book for information on such I'd be obliged for the information.) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |