Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I apologize. I read and was referring to the same quote, and interpreted it to mean that the first measurement was made with the coil at the base of the antenna. So where was it -- 78" from the bottom? Roy Lewallen, W7EL Yes, mast 78" - coil - 38" top whip we keep saying, looking at typical mobile antenna with loading coil about 2/3 up the quarter wave radiator. The lower the frequency, more loading, more pronounced effect. Caution, using toroid current transformers with scope leads would detune the antenna setup and introduce errors. You can get away with this at the base, but any stray capacitance up the radiator will detune it and skew the results. Need to use thermal RF current ammeters or current probe with detector and small meter together, no wires. Yuri, K3BU |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |