LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old November 10th 03, 02:14 AM
Yuri Blanarovich
 
Posts: n/a
Default


I apologize. I read and was referring to the same quote, and interpreted
it to mean that the first measurement was made with the coil at the base
of the antenna. So where was it -- 78" from the bottom?

Roy Lewallen, W7EL



Yes,
mast 78" - coil - 38" top whip
we keep saying, looking at typical mobile antenna with loading coil about 2/3
up the quarter wave radiator. The lower the frequency, more loading, more
pronounced effect.

Caution, using toroid current transformers with scope leads would detune the
antenna setup and introduce errors. You can get away with this at the base, but
any stray capacitance up the radiator will detune it and skew the results.
Need to use thermal RF current ammeters or current probe with detector and
small meter together, no wires.

Yuri, K3BU
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Smith Chart Quiz Radio913 Antenna 315 October 21st 03 05:31 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 02:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017