Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Roy Lewallen wrote:
Anyone who understands basic circuit theory knows this. But that doesn't include a number of the participants of this newsgroup. Otherwise, the thread would have been about two postings long. Too bad lumped inductors bear absolutely no resemblance in reality to 75m bugcatcher coils. Don't you believe Kraus when he says 180 degrees of current phase shift can be accomplished by a single coil in a wire antenna? I once had an engineer like you working for me. He took four man-months to engineer and breadboard a design that was over budget and out of spec. I, a VP, turned out another design (from scratch) in one long weekend that was under budget and exceeded the specs. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |