Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
When all this is done, I hope that readers come away with some assurance that circuit theory does work and can be applied to antenna problems -- provided that the assumptions made for the components are valid. Roy, isn't everything moot after Kraus tells us that an antenna coil can cause a 180 degree phase reversal? Plus his graph of current in a loaded antenna that shows a step function in the current at the loading coils? The entire purpose of this discussion was to determine if the following statement, allegedly made by W8JI, is true or false. "This is in any book, including the ARRL Handbook. If you look at HOW an inductor works, the current flowing in one terminal ALWAYS equals the current flowing out the other terminal." That's the very clear statement that was questioned by Yuri. And you have already proved it not to be true even with your toroidal coil. Incidentally, given a 180 degree phase reversing coil, the current is flowing into both ends at the same time. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |