Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Keith wrote:
My argument boils down to: What does this mean to the antenna builder or modeler? To the antenna user, or the antenna builder/modeler who doesn't care about current distribution, it would probably mean nothing. If any discrepancy is so small to be barely measurable, all this speculation about gross error when modeling is *to me* a load of hooey. The discrepancy varies anywhere from barely measureable to very measureable. Where is the beef that this claimed variation of current across a coil causes drastic modeling or coil placement calculation errors? Sorry, I just don't see it. What am I missing here? MK I think it should only matter to people who want to give advice on the subject. 73, Jim AC6XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |