Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"I looked at the ARRL Antenna Cook CD and it contains the same stuff." Declaring a coil to have zero size and loss does not make it so. Loss resistance alone does not delay anything. It kills electricity by converting it to heat instantly. It takes no prisoners. It has no electrical storage. Pure inductance delays current by exactly 90-degrees behind the applied a-c voltage. Resistance adds vectorially with inductive reactance to produce an impedance on some angle with the resistance between 0 and 90-degrees, depending upon the magnitudes of resistance and reactance. So, in any coil the current is delayed. Coax with a coiled center conductor is manufactured as delay line and is specified in microhenries per foot. Coils are made of conductors which suffer skin effect resistance. None escape loss, despite declarations. None occupy zero space. Assuming perfection is valuable for analysis, but should not be used as proof of performance. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |