LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 4th 03, 07:56 PM
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:
Six, the differences of Models employing the protocol and those not
employing it shows about 0.5dB difference.


The point you straddled in that marvelous enumeration of trivia, is that
there can be significantly greater that ".5dB" of difference in the
attributed current profiles along an antenna, due to a much greater than
".5dB" difference in some attributes of real vs. ideal loading coils.

But there's no question that it's possible to build an airplane that
flies, without understanding why if flies.

73, Jim AC6XG
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Smith Chart Quiz Radio913 Antenna 315 October 21st 03 05:31 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 02:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017