Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards" wrote
Does it bring more than 1dB gain with it? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC =============================== Richard, asking such awkward questions you get more insensitive to people's feelings every day. Are you not aware that a decrease in gain of even less than 1 dB can lose a contest? Reg, G4FGQ __________________ This post started with a question about a 28" loaded whip operating on 10 meters, presumably to be used in a mobile application. The concern of the post was how to model the antenna to determine whether it would have the pattern of a 1/4 wave or a 1/2 wave vertical radiator. But for a mobile application the affect of the auto body, the local environment, and even the direction the car is pointing can alter the free-space pattern of the antenna more than the difference in the relative radiation patterns of 1/4-wave and 1/2-wave verticals -- and particularly so for VHF/UHF antennas. If 1dB of antenna gain is so critical to amateurs, suggest that more attention needs to be paid in its system design to the operating environment of the antenna. Some NEC programs make it fairly straightforward to model the net patterns of antennas as mounted on vehicles, and should lead to a better understanding of antenna performance in the real world. RF |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote:
"This post started with a question about a 28" loaded whip operating on 10 meters presumably to be used in a mobile application." As Richard Fry noted, the vehicle and its position affect the antenna`s pattern. Also at 10 meters, a 1/4-wave whip would be little more than 8 feet long. A 28" whip is less than 1/3 a resonant length. Capacitive loading to make up the missing length is probably impractical. A loading coil is lossy but practical. Best choice is likely the 8-ft whip. A CB whip can be trimmed to resonance on 10-meters. If one wanted an antenna to fit between poles about 1/4-wave apart, one could use a 1/4-wave folded dipole, which is resonant due to its 1/2-wave circumference. Gain is only 0.5 dB less than a full 1/2-wave dipole. Like a small loop, the small folded dipole can be resonated with a high-Q series capacitor. Arnold B. Bailey in "TV and Other Receiving Antennas" gives the resistance of the 1/4-wave folded dipole as 6000 ohms at center frequency. This would require transformation to a lower impedance. Another resonant antenna that fits a 1/4-wave space is square and 1/4-wave on each side. It`s about 35 feet of wire for 10 meters and has a feedpoint resistance of 100 to 200 ohms depending on its height over the earth. Over good earth, feed one of its vertical sides in the center. Over poor earth, feed a horizontal side in the center. See ON4UN`s "Low-Band DXing" Chapter 10 for details on large loops. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna | Antenna | |||
Transmission Lines & Electrical Code | Antenna | |||
Quarter wavelength sloper for 80 mtrs | Antenna | |||
For the electrical engineers | Homebrew | |||
For the electrical engineers | Homebrew |