Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Yuri Blanarovich" wrote
Reg Edwards wrote The only difference in performance between a cage antenna and an ordinary thin-wire dipole is a modest increase in bandwidth. There is no increase in radiating/receiving efficience. Measurements by K8CFU found "surprising" increase in signal strenght from folded dipole/cage vs. straight radiator. - another subject for unbelievers, measure it and see what it really is. =================================== Emotional systems of measurement are becoming fashionable on this newsgroup. How many Centibels are there in one Surprise? How many Surprises are there in one Heart Attack? Frederick Emmons is turning over. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Compact HF antenna (RX-only) for reference in antenna tests? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |