"Yuri Blanarovich" wrote
Reg Edwards wrote
The only difference in performance between a cage antenna and an ordinary
thin-wire dipole is a modest increase in bandwidth. There is no increase
in
radiating/receiving efficience.


Measurements by K8CFU found "surprising" increase in signal strenght from
folded dipole/cage vs. straight radiator.

- another subject for unbelievers, measure it and see what it really is.

===================================

Emotional systems of measurement are becoming fashionable on this newsgroup.

How many Centibels are there in one Surprise?

How many Surprises are there in one Heart Attack?

Frederick Emmons is turning over.

Reg, G4FGQ shines with:

Emotional systems of measurement are becoming fashionable on this newsgroup.
How many Centibels are there in one Surprise?
How many Surprises are there in one Heart Attack?
Frederick Emmons is turning over.


Snotty remarks are even more fashionable on this and other newsgroups.

Why would you say that? Do you know who K8CFU is? Do you know what kind of work
has he and associates done? Did you read his articles about some findings? Did
you talked to him about some stuff that was not published?

Do you know EVERYTHING and have programs to calculate it RIGHT?
Are you another W8JI who "knows" everything and ridicules others?
Now measurements by someone else are wrong, but speculations based on limited
knowledge are the "law"?
So did you unemotionaly measure any of that stuff yet, or you "know" it?

I gladly discuss and argue about technical or other stuff, but I don't take a
crap and I bite back. Some would have figured that by now and adjusted their
way of communicating.

You seem to jump up without doing the homework and then missing the point and
may end up looking foolish.


Yuri, K3BU/m

Wow! Did I do sump'n wrong?

Wow! Did I do sump'n wrong?




Fuggetaboutit!