Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 1st 03, 02:35 PM
Yuri Blanarovich
 
Posts: n/a
Default


The INEVITABLE QUESTION
=== Do cage spreaders HAVE to be insulating? ===


YES for sure, for sure. The cage should be really folded dipole, one "wire"
going up (support, and grounded at the bottom) the other wire on the outside
(cage) coming down and fed against the ground or radials. Unless you just want
to make it fat radiator, then it doesn't matter.

When working with welding wire, try not to scratch it. It has very thin copper
layer, easy to scratch and then start corrosion and destruction of the wire.
You might want to put some coat of paint over it if you intend to keep it for
long. Epoxy paints or marine varnish are the best.

Yuri, K3BU
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 4th 03, 07:47 PM
SpamLover
 
Posts: n/a
Default

=== Do spreaders HAVE to be insulating? ===

YES for sure, for sure. The cage should be really folded dipole, one "wire"
going up (support, and grounded at the bottom) the other wire on the outside
(cage) coming down and fed against the ground or radials. Unless you just want
to make it fat radiator, then it doesn't matter.


Uh? AFAIK, a cage is not a folded monopole.

The "inside" vertical conductor would be shielded by the cage itself
('cept for its very bottom tip, which is grounded) and would not
radiate ('cept locally, within the cage, hence autocanceled). Apart
from discones I also remember seeing multi-kW 1940's TV dipole arrays
in which arms were huge, bulbous surfaces without slots.

This is getting *seriously* complicated.

One should be all thumbs to afford enough rules-of-thumb.

Some spreaders are indeed conductive.
But perhaps the fastening system acts as insulator.
http://www.stockroom.com/j030plus.htm
http://www.stockroom.com/j032plus.htm
You never know.
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 5th 03, 12:09 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 4 Nov 2003 11:47:55 -0800, (SpamLover) wrote:

Uh? AFAIK, a cage is not a folded monopole.

The "inside" vertical conductor would be shielded by the cage itself
('cept for its very bottom tip, which is grounded) and would not
radiate ('cept locally, within the cage, hence autocanceled). Apart
from discones I also remember seeing multi-kW 1940's TV dipole arrays
in which arms were huge, bulbous surfaces without slots.


Hi Filippo,

A cage can be a folded monopole (or folded dipole). Has nothing to do
with radiation as this is simply a transformer (not BalUN but
conventional transformer) and shielding the primary or secondary
(depending on which side is driven) does not interfere with either the
transformer action, nor radiation. The trick is to not short out the
skirt to the interior wire (if it exists - and it should to make
sense) at the driven end.

You can also construct a folded mono/dipole by segregating one wire
from the remaining bunch at the driven end (if there is no interior
wire). One of the virtues of a folded mono/dipole is the increase in
apparent radiator thickness causing a wider match range - a cage is
conceptually the same, but typically more extreme in its attempt to
create a thicker radiator.

The discone is another broad band radiator whose characteristics
follow this conceptual sense of building a thicker radiator. Consult:
http://www.qsl.net/kb7qhc/antenna/Discone/discone.htm
to observe how the flare of the skirt affects matching over frequency.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Compact HF antenna (RX-only) for reference in antenna tests? Crazy George Antenna 4 September 4th 03 05:32 PM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017