Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nigel
I have little experience with dish antennas but I do know that to provide the 'new' it is one percent insparation and 99 percent persperation, so how about this aproach: Determine frequency of use. Then draw a graph of frequency versus reactance change from a zero point indicating resonance of the prime frequency. This curve is parabolic and would be an ideal starting point as there would seem to be a connection If one would move to far away from the point of resonance I would suggest that the dish it's self would rise in temperature as current starts to flow instead of a pure 'loss less' reflective action. Regards Art "Nigel M" wrote in message ... I've been looking to make a linear parabolic reflector for Wi-Fi, I've found quite a few sources, such as: http://www.genericgeek.com/index.php?q=node/280 http://www.freeantennas.com/projects...te2/index.html Those I've found all give templates for a parabola, but without any explanation as to why they have chosen that *particular* parabola, or the formula used to draw it. As a result, the drawings are a bit "sketchy" to say the least! I know radio amateurs are often knowledgeable on antennae, so I thought this was a good place to ask. I'd like to know a bit more theory, and the pros and cons of various parabolic shapes. -- Nigel M "Occam's razor is not always sharp" |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Parabolic dish gives weak performance increase | Antenna |