LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old March 27th 05, 07:02 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Fry" wrote -
"Reg Edwards" wrote
The input resistance of a half-wave vertical near to ground is 2

or 3
thousand ohms. It is uncertain because it depends on

wire/conductor
diameter and on the conductivity and permittivity of the soil.
Because of its high value it is also sensitive to the antenna's
environment, trees, etc.

________________

Terman (Radio Engineer's Handbook, p 846) shows a chart for the

radiation
resistance and reactance ranges for five, guyed MW broadcast towers,

as
measured against a good radial ground system--an ohm or two above

true
earth. For electrically 1/2-wave radiators, R ranged from 300 ohms

to 450
ohms and Z ranged from about -100 ohms to -350 ohms.

RF


=====================================

As I said, 1/2-wave antenna input impedance is a function of conductor
diameter. It is not a relatively fixed value (around 36 ohms) as is a
1/4-wave vertical.

Impedance decreases as diameter increases. Or as the ratio of
height/diameter decreases.

Terman's LF and MF towers (not wires) have extrordinary thick
conductors (probably latttice masts) compared with a low antenna
height in terms of wavelengths. Hence the low input impedances in his
examples.

If I remember correctly, Terman makes no reference to height/diameter
ratio and is therefore misleading by using tower antennas as typical
examples. He tells only half the story. Terman should not always be
used as the Bible.

EZNEC can be used to estimate input impedances of the more common
1/2-wave wire antennas at HF when very near to ground. Which is what
amateurs are interested in. They usually fall in the range 1500 to
3500 ohms.

At VHF and UHF with short, fat, thick rods for conductors, (similar in
proportion to LF lattice towers) input impedances can fall to several
hundred ohms or smaller.

Input impedance values of isolated dipoles are theoretically
calculable but are impossible to measure. Nevertheless, calculated
values are very useful in antenna system design. Couldn't do without
them!

Maths takes precedence over measurements. Without maths, experimenters
flounder about in the dark.
----
Reg, G4FGQ


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 11:22 PM
Introduction to "AM" Medium Wave DXing - by the Ontario DX Association (ODXC) RHF Shortwave 3 January 11th 05 04:14 PM
1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical Dave Antenna 6 May 26th 04 02:28 AM
Smith Chart Quiz Radio913 Antenna 315 October 21st 03 06:31 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 08:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017