Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "TJ" wrote in message news:P1Z2e.864278$8l.567848@pd7tw1no... It's amazing how just one comment by a single person got this group into an uproar. I really think that the public in general has a romance with the life of the trucker brought on by the movie and media hype. Truckers are just ordinary people who do an thankless job of moving just about everything there is in North America to and from wholesalers to retailers. Over the years the average trucker's education level has gone from grade school drop outs to men and women holding degrees of various ranges of education. Over the years I've come to know a rather large group of people from a very large slice of various levels of education, similar to that of most truckers. I hold two degrees and a commercial Radio Telephone license, but for some reason I ended up returning to "trucking" all the time. And all the trucks I've driven, over 1 million miles, I've always had my amateur radio(s) and a CB. Each had it's own nicessity and each one had it's own language. On one radio I as a respected amateur radio operator who drove truck, on the other I was just another trucker looking for a traffic report. Oh, for those who are of the illusion that truckers are the cause of all the terrible accident on the highways, well the only person your fooling is yourself. To get the facts do a little research and you will find that four wheeled vehicles cause more accidents than any other vehicle. Trucks seem to fall into the same catigory as motorcycles do in the public's perseption of the cause of accidents. After you have done your research you will find that both trucks and motorcycles end of up being a very low percentage of the cause of accidents. The only thing the public sees is that when a truck gets into a bad accident it is very bad and devestating distruction. But statistics show there are fewer truck accidents than four wheeled vehicles and there are also far fewer accidents that are caused by trucks entirely. But, this is just this over educated truckers opinion. 73 de ve7agw, Al Eh, I agree with you for the most part - BUT - you "seem" to have missed the point. "That" "trucker" seemed to be suggesting that the service they provide sort of entitles them to break the laws. It does NOT. "My" comment was (not word for word) that if he broke the rules of the road much as he is suggesting he does of the FCC, then it wouldn't be long or take much to end the line for him. RULES ARE RULES. LAWS ARE LAWS. Be you a truck driver, cop, lawyer, politician, doctor, we ALL have laws to live with, if we're to survive with any sense of common ground. ANY ONE who breaks those rules/laws is only adding to the problem. "I" know some truckers, I know the job they do..... I know the sacrifices they make - time away from home and family. "I" am not disputing that. What I was disputing was that person's "holier than thou" approach "since he is a trucker". THAT is what I dismiss........ NOT THE JOB. I was just telling him to come off his high horse, there may come a day when his services are no longer required, then what? HE won't be so high and mighty then. It is guys like that who are the bad apple, and give the rest of you a black eye. Just like a bad cop gives the rest a black eye, a quack doctor does to his/her profession, a politician who takes bribes/steals. ALL give their profession a bad name. Like it or not, every group has them, truckers included. That one stuck his head out to be noticed. He brought attention to himself. Why can't he mutually respect hams and what they have, as he expects the hams to respect him for what he does? It IS a two way street. There is NO reason he or any of the rest can't do a small bit of studying when laying over at a truck stop or waiting to be loaded, go take an exam, pass it, get a license, then talk with the rest of us who would welcome them. IF they don't want to take an exam, then WHY violate the laws and pick fights with the hams, because they're too damned lazy to do the right thing? It isn't the hams fault. The hams wanted their license, so they did what it took to get it....... If you intend to defend his approach, then I can't agree with you. As to the rest of what you said, perhaps you're an example they can follow. Maybe "you" can convince them, being one of the bunch. As for "accidents", "I am not a statistician, so I can't say for sure. I could get into the argument regarding bikes, since I ride one as well, but again, without facts to back me up, I'm not going to. cl |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "cl" wrote in message o.verio.net... "TJ" wrote in message news:P1Z2e.864278$8l.567848@pd7tw1no... It's amazing how just one comment by a single person got this group into an uproar. I really think that the public in general has a romance with the life of the trucker brought on by the movie and media hype. Truckers are just ordinary people who do an thankless job of moving just about everything there is in North America to and from wholesalers to retailers. Over the years the average trucker's education level has gone from grade school drop outs to men and women holding degrees of various ranges of education. Over the years I've come to know a rather large group of people from a very large slice of various levels of education, similar to that of most truckers. I hold two degrees and a commercial Radio Telephone license, but for some reason I ended up returning to "trucking" all the time. And all the trucks I've driven, over 1 million miles, I've always had my amateur radio(s) and a CB. Each had it's own nicessity and each one had it's own language. On one radio I as a respected amateur radio operator who drove truck, on the other I was just another trucker looking for a traffic report. Oh, for those who are of the illusion that truckers are the cause of all the terrible accident on the highways, well the only person your fooling is yourself. To get the facts do a little research and you will find that four wheeled vehicles cause more accidents than any other vehicle. Trucks seem to fall into the same catigory as motorcycles do in the public's perseption of the cause of accidents. After you have done your research you will find that both trucks and motorcycles end of up being a very low percentage of the cause of accidents. The only thing the public sees is that when a truck gets into a bad accident it is very bad and devestating distruction. But statistics show there are fewer truck accidents than four wheeled vehicles and there are also far fewer accidents that are caused by trucks entirely. But, this is just this over educated truckers opinion. 73 de ve7agw, Al Eh, I agree with you for the most part - BUT - you "seem" to have missed the point. "That" "trucker" seemed to be suggesting that the service they provide sort of entitles them to break the laws. It does NOT. "My" comment was (not word for word) that if he broke the rules of the road much as he is suggesting he does of the FCC, then it wouldn't be long or take much to end the line for him. RULES ARE RULES. LAWS ARE LAWS. Be you a truck driver, cop, lawyer, politician, doctor, we ALL have laws to live with, if we're to survive with any sense of common ground. ANY ONE who breaks those rules/laws is only adding to the problem. "I" know some truckers, I know the job they do..... I know the sacrifices they make - time away from home and family. "I" am not disputing that. What I was disputing was that person's "holier than thou" approach "since he is a trucker". THAT is what I dismiss........ NOT THE JOB. I was just telling him to come off his high horse, there may come a day when his services are no longer required, then what? HE won't be so high and mighty then. It is guys like that who are the bad apple, and give the rest of you a black eye. Just like a bad cop gives the rest a black eye, a quack doctor does to his/her profession, a politician who takes bribes/steals. ALL give their profession a bad name. Like it or not, every group has them, truckers included. That one stuck his head out to be noticed. He brought attention to himself. Why can't he mutually respect hams and what they have, as he expects the hams to respect him for what he does? It IS a two way street. There is NO reason he or any of the rest can't do a small bit of studying when laying over at a truck stop or waiting to be loaded, go take an exam, pass it, get a license, then talk with the rest of us who would welcome them. IF they don't want to take an exam, then WHY violate the laws and pick fights with the hams, because they're too damned lazy to do the right thing? It isn't the hams fault. The hams wanted their license, so they did what it took to get it....... If you intend to defend his approach, then I can't agree with you. As to the rest of what you said, perhaps you're an example they can follow. Maybe "you" can convince them, being one of the bunch. As for "accidents", "I am not a statistician, so I can't say for sure. I could get into the argument regarding bikes, since I ride one as well, but again, without facts to back me up, I'm not going to. cl Oh yes, laws are made to in most cases protect the greater part of the public and we all have to abide by the laws. I have no respect for any person regardless of what trade they perform, if they break the law then they are a criminal. If it be the FCC, Industry Canada (Canadian FCC) or the traffic laws then they deserve to be caught and punished. Like you say, if it be a cop, doctor, trucker or lawyer, we all have to abide by the law others wise it will be a complete mayham free for all. I dispise truckers who are of the oppinion that they are above the law, I know of a fair number of truckers who wrote and passed the exam for their ham tickett and now only use their CB for loading docks and traffic reports. But most of these men and women have higher education levels than the old truckers use to. Any trucker who thinks he/she is above the law is only fooling themselves, because it's only a matter of time before they will get caught and they will eventually. I've been at a scale when the safety bliz happens all across Canada/USA and the authorities will go right through a tractor and want to see every licence for every radio in the truck. And if the driver doesn't have one he losses the radio. And I'm glad they do this, cause it cleans up the amateur bands from these pirate amateurs. I get really ticked when I hear some fool talking on a radio who thinks he's some sort of a "god" because of his trade. Let's face it the astronauts had to pass the exams to get their amateur licence(s) so why should anyone else get it given to them. I wish the FCC and Industry Canada had more powers to eliminate the interferance from unlicenced, licenced and industrial sources. The laws are there but these agencies don't seem to have the muscle to enforce them, wheather it be from monatary cut back or whatever. I remember the days when an unlicenced operator was more likely to get caught than not and this was a big deteriant in controlling the problem. Now days it seems that we as licenced operators have do these different agencies job for them. I guess that's another topic for another time. 73...ve7agw, Al |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|