Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:59:42 GMT, "
wrote: the problem: My antenna is somewhat related thus my interest in what creates an elongated lobe the answer: which is formed using Yagi principles. Hi Art, Your question already answers your question. You have a tendency to just blow right on taking no notice of this to create the SAME question again: The question however, is specifically related to Yagi's and its narrowed lobes. Do you know what it is that creats an elongated lobe on a high gain yagi i.e not totally round.? formed using Yagi principles. (to quote you) Nothing more, nothing less. Exactly. Now, are we going to be treated by another round of your complaints about Shakespeare and the quality of gurus; or are you going to stick with technical discussion and respond to the obvious points? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Richard.
No one has come up with a explanation BUT there are real gurus out there, It's just that those who qualify as gurus have just thinned out a bit. The question still pertains to Yagis and the narrowing of lobes You have posted twice now and added nothing that relates to a possible answer. Tho there are many who perceive themselves as experts and then consistently show what they really are. I can think of one or two who can really address this question with a logical answer. Cecil, Roy and a couple of others qualify and have yet to respond You have disqualified yourself based on your responses, so like myself you will have to wait to learn. Yagi's have been studied in depth and for many years by many tho apparently not by you or others that have replied so far. Place your bets on who is the real guru of this group that comes forward to explain with logic and to the point You Richard, can read your old QST's in a hurry and surely find the answer to get back into the ratings as I don't think that new knoweledge is around the bend, just a small manipulation of "old" knoweledge will surely suffice. Think "end effect" and "none- resistive residuals" along coupled radiating elements for starters.If that draws a blank then assuredly you wear no clothes Art "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:59:42 GMT, " wrote: the problem: My antenna is somewhat related thus my interest in what creates an elongated lobe the answer: which is formed using Yagi principles. Hi Art, Your question already answers your question. You have a tendency to just blow right on taking no notice of this to create the SAME question again: The question however, is specifically related to Yagi's and its narrowed lobes. Do you know what it is that creats an elongated lobe on a high gain yagi i.e not totally round.? formed using Yagi principles. (to quote you) Nothing more, nothing less. Exactly. Now, are we going to be treated by another round of your complaints about Shakespeare and the quality of gurus; or are you going to stick with technical discussion and respond to the obvious points? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:53:44 GMT, "
wrote: No one has come up with a explanation Hi Art, As usual, I see you simply enjoy posting without corresponding. C'mon, it is more than obvious you have no interest in any explanation other than your own. Roy and a couple of others qualify and have yet to respond You've spit on them so much that is hardly surprising - is it? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Not so. If I cannot accept an answer that I figure to be unreasonable then I
do not accept them. In Roy's case I accept the majority of his explanations, but not all. In your case you come up with many knoweledgable explanations on various facets of science ,but in general, you concentrate more in attacking others opinions with out supplying corrections I say this only where your posts are clear and not smattered with relatively unused words where a shorter one would suffice How ever those are in the minority. If I do not concurr with any explanation offerred .in no way does this suggest that I am spitting on the individual and thus treating him with disrespect. In your case you treat me in disrespect which as far as I am concerned requires reciprical treatment. You ask for it and you will get it from me without retreat On the other hand respect demands respect, your choice as I am now americanised for retaliation without regard to common courtesy as per the Britts Art "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:53:44 GMT, " wrote: No one has come up with a explanation Hi Art, As usual, I see you simply enjoy posting without corresponding. C'mon, it is more than obvious you have no interest in any explanation other than your own. Roy and a couple of others qualify and have yet to respond You've spit on them so much that is hardly surprising - is it? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:40:38 GMT, "
wrote: If I cannot accept an answer that I figure to be unreasonable then I do not accept them. Hi Art, This is your standard line of bull****. Don't blame Shakespeare for this standard offering of anglo-saxon clarity. The simple answer to your question was already revealed in your question which offered in part: is formed using Yagi principles. Nothing more, nothing less. Exactly. I know this may come as a shock to you, but the obvious problem is that you have absolutely no understanding of just what Yagi principles. means and you refuse to go there. If you want to make this a 12 step Shakespearian comedy, keep ignoring the elephant in your living room. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB | Antenna | |||
GP -> yagi driven element? | Antenna | |||
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
>>>>> DIRECTIONAL YAGI FOR 92.9 MHz (180 degrees)<<<<<<<<< | Antenna | |||
Quad vs Yagi (or log) | Antenna |