Richard.
No one has come up with a explanation BUT there are real gurus out there,
It's just that those who qualify as gurus have just thinned out a bit.
The question still pertains to Yagis and the narrowing of lobes
You have posted twice now and added nothing that relates to a possible
answer.
Tho there are many who perceive themselves as experts and then consistently
show
what they really are. I can think of one or two who can really address this
question
with a logical answer. Cecil, Roy and a couple of others qualify and have
yet to respond
You have disqualified yourself based on your responses, so like myself you
will have to wait to learn. Yagi's have been studied in depth and for many
years by many
tho apparently not by you or others that have replied so far.
Place your bets on who is the real guru of this group that comes forward
to explain with logic and to the point You Richard, can read your old QST's
in a hurry
and surely find the answer to get back into the ratings as I don't think
that new
knoweledge is around the bend, just a small manipulation of "old" knoweledge
will
surely suffice. Think "end effect" and "none- resistive residuals" along
coupled radiating
elements for starters.If that draws a blank then assuredly you wear no
clothes

Art


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:59:42 GMT, "
wrote:

the problem:
My antenna is somewhat related thus my interest in what creates an
elongated lobe
the answer:
which is formed using Yagi principles.

Hi Art,

Your question already answers your question. You have a tendency to
just blow right on taking no notice of this to create the SAME
question again:
The question however, is specifically related to Yagi's
and its narrowed lobes.
Do you know what it is that creats an elongated lobe
on a high gain yagi i.e not totally round.?
formed using Yagi principles. (to quote you)
Nothing more, nothing less.
Exactly.

Now, are we going to be treated by another round of your complaints
about Shakespeare and the quality of gurus; or are you going to stick
with technical discussion and respond to the obvious points?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC