Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 28th 05, 03:40 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Not so. If I cannot accept an answer that I figure to be unreasonable then I
do not accept them. In Roy's case I accept
the majority of his explanations, but not all. In your case you come up with
many knoweledgable explanations
on various facets of science ,but in general, you concentrate more in
attacking others opinions with out supplying corrections
I say this only where your posts are clear and not smattered with relatively
unused words where a shorter one would suffice How ever those are in the
minority.
If I do not concurr with any explanation offerred .in no way does this
suggest that I am spitting on the individual and thus treating him with
disrespect. In your case you treat me in disrespect which as far as I am
concerned requires reciprical treatment. You ask for it and you will get it
from me without retreat On the other hand respect demands respect, your
choice as I am now americanised for retaliation without regard to common
courtesy as per the Britts
Art



"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:53:44 GMT, "
wrote:

No one has come up with a explanation


Hi Art,

As usual, I see you simply enjoy posting without corresponding.
C'mon, it is more than obvious you have no interest in any explanation
other than your own.

Roy and a couple of others qualify and have yet to respond

You've spit on them so much that is hardly surprising - is it?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC



  #2   Report Post  
Old March 28th 05, 08:23 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:40:38 GMT, "
wrote:
If I cannot accept an answer that I figure to be unreasonable then I
do not accept them.


Hi Art,

This is your standard line of bull****. Don't blame Shakespeare for
this standard offering of anglo-saxon clarity.

The simple answer to your question was already revealed in your
question which offered in part:
is formed using Yagi principles.
Nothing more, nothing less.

Exactly.

I know this may come as a shock to you, but the obvious problem is
that you have absolutely no understanding of just what
Yagi principles.

means and you refuse to go there. If you want to make this a 12 step
Shakespearian comedy, keep ignoring the elephant in your living room.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB [email protected] Antenna 76 February 10th 05 07:14 AM
GP -> yagi driven element? Dan Jacobson Antenna 0 February 7th 05 07:28 PM
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc Richard Antenna 4 June 14th 04 01:48 PM
>>>>> DIRECTIONAL YAGI FOR 92.9 MHz (180 degrees)<<<<<<<<< Dr. Slick Antenna 18 March 20th 04 08:40 PM
Quad vs Yagi (or log) Thierry Antenna 23 February 18th 04 08:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017