LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
Old March 31st 05, 12:29 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:09:13 -0500, Albert wrote:
This could be an ID modulation to serve the receiver's logic. In
other words, correction is based upon both signal strength AND
modulation.


I think it's even simpler than that... It could be based on the signal
strength alone.


Hi Albert,

Given the features you've imputed to the design, transmitter drop out
(loss of AC power) would be indistinguishable from puppy border
crossings.

Or, yes, it could be signal strength alone (still argues for a simple
Amp any 'splanation considered).

Part Deux of the mysteries of the VLF is looked forward to.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Antenna Advice Chris Shortwave 5 September 20th 04 02:04 AM
Mobile Ant L match ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 14 January 20th 04 04:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017