Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:09:13 -0500, Albert wrote:
This could be an ID modulation to serve the receiver's logic. In other words, correction is based upon both signal strength AND modulation. I think it's even simpler than that... It could be based on the signal strength alone. Hi Albert, Given the features you've imputed to the design, transmitter drop out (loss of AC power) would be indistinguishable from puppy border crossings. Or, yes, it could be signal strength alone (still argues for a simple Amp any 'splanation considered). Part Deux of the mysteries of the VLF is looked forward to. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Antenna Advice | Shortwave | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna |