Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Bessler wrote:
My friend says that a double bazooka is 98% efficiant and that a dipole is only about 70% efficiant. Is he right? Will a double bazooka outperform a dipole enough to notice a difference on 40m? The efficiency graphs in The ARRL Antenna Book indicate that the double bazooka is NEVER more efficient than a dipole and that it has lower efficiency at every frequency other than resonance. Is your friend an Old Wife? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Double Bazooka question | Antenna | |||
double double (bi)quad - feed impedance? | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment |