Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is no power loss in either pure capacitance or pure inductance.
There is loss only in the resistive (or conductive) components: the RF resistance in the wire and the RF conductance in the dielectric. It is fundamental that the inductance and capacitance in a TEM transmission line are just what cause the energy to propagate from one end to the other...or I suppose if you view it at a higher level, you could say that the same fields which yield the effects we call capacitance and inductance also cause the propagation of energy when they result from a TEM transmission line configuration. I'm sure other valid ways of looking at the situation exist too. (I should also mention that there can be some power lost to radiation, but in most cases that's quite small.) Increased loss at high frequencies comes from several sources: smaller skin depth at higher frequencies means higher resistance in the wires. That goes up as the square root of frequency, once you get to a skin depth which is small compared with the thickness of the copper. Higher frequencies result in higher dielectric loss, though that's generally not an issue below a few GHz. But imperfections along a line can cause significant attenuation because of multiple reflections; dozens of small reflections can add up to a big problem. Cheers, Tom Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave | |||
Comet B-10 VHF Antenna Question | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna |