Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Question: could some of this loss be caused by the capacitance in
the line ? ================================= Yes. It's another way of looking at it. In addition to current in the load, there is a current which flows between the pair of wires through the capacitance. Increase the capacitance and this current increases. There is negligible loss in the capacitance itself. But the capacitor current has to flow along the wires to get there. And so the additional capacitor-current loss actually occurs in the wire resistance. But this is just the same as saying that loss is greater because the impedance Zo is lower (due to the increase in capacitance). The opposite effect occurs by increasing inductance. An increase in inductance increases Zo and so much reduces attenuation. That's why 88 mH inductive loading coils were used at intervals of 2000 yards at audio frequencies in very long telephone cables. An invention of the great but modest Oliver Heaviside which I think somebody else patented and manufactured by many millions. 88 mH loading coils, spaced at 2000 yards, increases Zo from about 300 ohms to 1100 ohms, thus reducing loss in dB per mile to about one third. ---- Reg, G4FGQ. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave | |||
Comet B-10 VHF Antenna Question | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna |