Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 6th 05, 10:48 PM
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Richard Harrison wrote:

Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"If we simply amplify the receiver voltage through a near infinite
impedance FET with virtually no load on the signal, do we get the signal
information?"

Not as much as possible.

Just as the reactance must be tuned out of an antenna to receive maximum
available power, to get maximum received carrier power, the resistance
of the load in the antenna must be reduced to only that matcing the
radiation resistance. Walter Maxwell, W2DU has had it right all along.
Maximum power transfer requires a conjugate match.


I happend across this just the other day. On page 1426, "Physics:
Volume Two Electricity, Magnetism, and Light", Ronald Blum/Duane E.
Roller it reads "Note that the optimum power transfer occurs when p=0,
R=Z0, and t=1. [p and t are reflection and transmission coefficients]
In general, for lossy lines, this takes place when the load impedance in
the complex conjugate of the characteristic impedance, just as with
lumped circuits."

Seems to be the only way for p = (R-Z0)/(R+Z0) = 0 and
t = 2R/R+Z0 = 1 to hold true for any Z0.

ac6xg

ac6xg

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI


  #2   Report Post  
Old April 7th 05, 02:32 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Harrison wrote:

Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"If we simply amplify the receiver voltage through a near infinite
impedance FET with virtually no load on the signal, do we get the signal
information?"

Not as much as possible.

Just as the reactance must be tuned out of an antenna to receive maximum
available power, to get maximum received carrier power, the resistance
of the load in the antenna must be reduced to only that matcing the
radiation resistance. Walter Maxwell, W2DU has had it right all along.
Maximum power transfer requires a conjugate match.


But the information in a received signal can be had while
consuming very little of the received signal's power. For
instance, ten feet of wire into my IC-756PRO results in
perfect reception of Neal Boortz on WTAW on 1620 kHz.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #3   Report Post  
Old April 6th 05, 09:42 PM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Henty Kolesnik wrote:
"How about a little more explanation on the 50% reradiation?"

The antenna doesn`t care where the power comes from. It can be from
connected drive or induced. Induced power has two loads, radiation
resistance and connected load (receiver input). If they are matched
(equal), 50% is absorbed in each.

If they are mismatched, paximum power transfer can`t occur. A higher
percentage of the available energy will be rejected or reradiated
because the receiver input is nearer to an open circuit (rejection) or a
short circuit (reradiation) than it is when it is matched to the
antenna`s radiation resistance.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KBWZI

  #4   Report Post  
Old April 6th 05, 10:16 PM
Henry Kolesnik
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OK....I think I uderstand the transmitter side, perhaps a little better. If
a 50 ohm transmitter is matched to a 50 ohm antenna there is no reflection
and all the power is radiated. If the antenna is not 50 ohms then there is
reflected power from the antenna to the transmitter and since the
transmitter cannot absorb power it reflects it to the antenna ad infinitum.
I also know that electric power generating station don't like a match
because a 50/50 deal is not good for profits. I understand the transmitter
and power generator however I'm having trouble getting my mind around whats
happening with the receiver and antenna. Can it be put another way so I can
try to understand it?
tnx

--

73
Hank WD5JFR
"Richard Harrison" wrote in message
...
Henty Kolesnik wrote:
"How about a little more explanation on the 50% reradiation?"

The antenna doesn`t care where the power comes from. It can be from
connected drive or induced. Induced power has two loads, radiation
resistance and connected load (receiver input). If they are matched
(equal), 50% is absorbed in each.

If they are mismatched, paximum power transfer can`t occur. A higher
percentage of the available energy will be rejected or reradiated
because the receiver input is nearer to an open circuit (rejection) or a
short circuit (reradiation) than it is when it is matched to the
antenna`s radiation resistance.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KBWZI



  #5   Report Post  
Old April 6th 05, 11:43 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:16:53 GMT, "Henry Kolesnik"
wrote:

If the antenna is not 50 ohms then there is
reflected power from the antenna to the transmitter and since the
transmitter cannot absorb power it reflects it to the antenna ad infinitum.


Hi Hank,

This again points out the fallacy of treating different matches as
having equal outcomes.

A simple, intuitive test of your statement about would ask the
question:
"Who needs a tuner for mismatches then?"

No doubt the thread will enlarge with discourse on the theory of
Thevenin (Norton by implication), Conjugation, Efficiency, Max
available power, Max power transfer, and any number of other mantras
dear to the heart. And yet none of them will explain that if we have:
transmitter cannot absorb power it reflects it to the antenna ad infinitum.

"Who needs a tuner for mismatches then?"

Saving a few hundred rounds of such non-answers, and suspecting if I
held feet to the fire, the discussion would then turn to answering
"Who needs a tuner for mismatches then?"
in terms of psychology:
"A tuner makes the transmitter happy."

A such, it reduces to the economy of time. If you are in this hobby
long enough, the investment in a tuner will yield that same level of
transmitter happiness at a lesser expense than would monthly visits to
the pharmacist for Prozac.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


  #6   Report Post  
Old April 5th 05, 11:47 PM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I used a small TV antenna, fed with 300 ohm ribbon through a homebrew 1/2
wave coaxial balun made from RG-11/u to make a 4 to 1 jobber. Worked great
with my Ten Tech transverter on six meters.

Years ago I did a similar trick with 2 meter AM phone and another type of TV
antenna.

So the answer is yes....however...now a days you normally find 70 ohm TV
coax and a balun up on the antenna. That Balun will not take much power.
Ten watts not a problem, over that....well. And you won't need a balun.
Just hook the coax to the rig. Take the slight SWR and don't sweat it.

BUT again....most to all TV antenna's are NOT cut to the ham bands.....

Dan/W4NTI

"ken wood" wrote in message
...
can you tx on a tv antenna

http://community.webtv.net/rci2900/doc



  #7   Report Post  
Old April 7th 05, 02:36 AM
Hal Rosser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ken wood" wrote in message
...
can you tx on a tv antenna



yep. The tv stations do it all the time.
many hams have used those rabbit-ears for 2-meter work


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discone antenna plans [email protected] Antenna 13 January 14th 05 11:51 PM
Yaesu FT-857D questions Joe S. Equipment 6 October 25th 04 09:40 AM
LongWire Antenna Jim B Shortwave 5 March 2nd 04 09:36 AM
Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] RHF Shortwave 0 February 23rd 04 12:59 PM
EH Antenna Revisited Walter Maxwell Antenna 47 January 16th 04 04:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017