LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old April 8th 05, 06:23 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:09:17 -0700, "Anonymous"
wrote:

Robin Ferguson, a senior member of the technical staff at NIST and
congressional lobbyist, cited three specific channels that are especially
disturbed but without a plausible explanation for the malady that affects
only these three and not the frequencies immediately above nor below them.


3 things wrong here, there is no such person at NIST, it would be
against the law for them to lobby, and the rest is baloney. Other
than that, it would serve as great kindling if we got hard copies of
this.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna RHF Shortwave 1 January 24th 05 09:37 PM
Shortwave Listener (SWL) Frequency & Schedule Resources that are available "OnLine" { Links / URLS } RHF Shortwave 1 January 6th 05 04:00 PM
Shortwave Listener (SWL) Frequency & Schedule Resources that are available "OnLine" { Links / URLS } RHF Shortwave 0 January 6th 05 12:01 PM
Grundig Yacht Boy 80 and 400 Viktar Siarheichyk Shortwave 5 December 31st 03 02:31 AM
Shortwave signals on a simple $5.00 portable am-fm receiver? Drew Shortwave 8 November 5th 03 05:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017