Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wes Stewart" wrote in message ... On 9 Apr 2005 14:22:06 -0700, wrote: Please don't get upset! I don't intend to actually do this! All you antenna experts out there. If I have a tower say 60 feet tall and I can only put one set of guy wires up, should they go near the top of the structure or near the middle? What are the forces that the wind exerts on a tower and are these forces evenly distributed? This is really a complicated subject and off the cuff remarks and supposition are worthless. The forces *can* be analyzed as uniformly distributed but usually, the wind pressure is stronger near the top, particularly if there is an antenna up there, which is the normal reason for a tower. You might be inclined to say aha, then the top is the place for the guys. But, guys turn horizontal force into vertical force that tries to drive the tower into the ground. With the top and bottom restrained, then the middle might be inclinded to deflect horizontally under wind load. With it so moved, then the down force from the weight of the tower and the additional force from the guys can cause the tower to buckle. I seem to remember from "structures" classes that the rule of thumb was that if the solid diameter of a member was one tenth or more of the height then the member will break in normal compression mode. (Top loaded) If the ratio of length to diameter was more then the member will buckle. Seems like a good starting point to me. But then that is the easy part since one would have to tension the guy wires to a specific force with multiple variables ! Note Tower manufacturers do not have to introduce safety factors in their calculations as would a crane or pulley manufacturer where personel are usualy in the area of use.Thus strength of material used must be on the mark. This is why I would guy at 30 feet and accept that movement at the top will still happen but with less moment of forces (wind loads) that would be around in the event of no guys. Art Another concern is mechanical resonance. Top guying is going to make the top resemble a string on a musical instrument with the wind trying to pluck it. It has been my (sad) experience with a Cushcraft AV-80 tubular vertical that guying half way up, is equally bad. I had a resonance set up and the tubing bent to yield and broke in two right *under* the guys. When I installed it I didn't have the data sheet but knew that it needed guys. So I guessed at 50% up. Since then I've acquired the data sheet and the recommendation is to guy about 2/3 up from the bottom. The bottom line is to listen to the manufacturer. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"(A)What are the forces that the wind exerts on a tower and
(B)are these forces evenly distributed?" A. More than you might think! B. No. Depends on the particular configuration of the tower's load, and the strength/speed of the wind. Infinitely variable. You already know that there's no 'good' solution for one set of guywires. The 'best' solution I've heard so far is an excess of insurance and a gulible claims adjuster. 'Doc |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you all for the information. I knew I could find good"stuff" out
there. The wind generator (not an antenna) I was planning has limited information available as to loads. ie. No Flat Plate or FPE numbers. The only statement is that the tower must take a 200 pound lateral thrust and not deflect more than six inches with winds of 200 mph. The Trylon T-200 tower specs. for my maximum wind speed area (from the chart at their web site), shows that the T-200 will take a 42 pound lateral thrust at winds of 85 mph. If 120 mph winds cause the wind generator to exert 200 pounds of lateral thrust, what speed of the wind will yield the 42 pound maximum lateral thrust that the tower will hold? Please show your work. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
fcrumpler,
Figured as a simple ratio, about 25-30 mph. No idea if that's accurate... 'Doc |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear "fcrumpler" no call, no location:
Theoretically, the force produced by moving air impacting on a flat plate is proportionally to the square of the air's velocity. However, in the real world where one should appropriately deal with wind gusts and variability of materials, things are not so simple. Safety factors should be used. Accommodation for the significant vibration to be caused by your proposed "wind generator" must be made. Numbers supplied by some vendors involve no safety factors. You need to retain a Professional Engineer licensed in your state or province who is experienced with vertical wind structures. This is certainly the case if the proposed structure is able to damage other property or endanger living things. It is not safe for you to scale the numbers that you have. Too little information. Too much risk. Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Exercise on the NORAD freqs - possible missle launch | Scanner | |||
MilAir Conducting G-8 Exercise Now. | Scanner | |||
Duplex on MilAir NORAD freqs with exercise | Scanner | |||
Mental Exercise | Antenna |