LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
Old May 4th 05, 02:44 PM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Vile 5 wrote:
"And all the cust service responses from various cell phone antenna
sites say there is not much for 900, 1000, 1100 mhz which is what the
specs say on the phone."

That`s reasonable. Cell phones communicate with whichever base station
works best in a wide network. This is almost the ultimate space and
frequency diversity system. Antennas are low which limits range. No
problem as contact is lost it is immediately re-established
automatically with another station, the new best choice.

As azimuths between phones and bases are constantly changing,
concentrating phone energy at a articular azimuth does not make sense if
the phone is moving.

Efficiency makes sense. Concentrating energy along the horizontal makes
sense for most users.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] William Mcfadden Shortwave 0 March 1st 05 08:00 AM
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] William Mcfadden Info 0 January 1st 05 08:00 AM
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] William Mcfadden Info 0 December 1st 04 08:00 AM
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] William Mcfadden Shortwave 0 September 1st 04 08:00 AM
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] William Mcfadden Shortwave 0 February 1st 04 08:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017