LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old April 26th 05, 05:44 PM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Art Unwin wrote:
"Remember, Richard was replying to the initial post which was very
specific in nature regarding lab testing and degree of error."

Antenna test facilities involve far fields. Kraus says on page 831 of
his 3rd edition of "Antennas":
"---it is obvious that measurement usually takes place in the far
field."

This can be far indeed with highly directive antennas.

My initial response included:
"A lab may put its stamp of approval on your instrument, but your best
assurance may be measurement of known values. The termperature of
ice-water or the voltage of new dry cells, for example. You usually can
try several dry cells for confirmation or averaging.

In antennas, one strategy for successful gain determination is
comparison with an antenna of known gain."

My posting was imperfect. There`s nothing that can`t be improved, but
were I re-writing my posting, I can`t think how I might improve it.

I don`t think my example of checking gain of an array using skywaves was
amiss. We build shortwave antennas to use skywaves. We give antenna
gains in free-space because it makes sense.

I said we built a small-scale model first because we can measure the
model`s characteristics without a helicopter. The full-scale antenna
performed exactly like the model. Computer modeling has eliminated the
small-scale model step in new designs.

We checked only the first off of the new design, with the full
confidence that subsequent antennas of the same design would perform the
same.

Of the first antenna, we measured everything including the currents
along each element. We used an R-F ammeter in a loop suspended from the
element and towed along with a string. We read it using a telescope. The
antenna was a scientific success as well as a practical success. This
differs from some of the oil wells I was to drill later, though some of
those succeeded too.

I can only post what I know and it will never satisfy what everybody
wants to read. Sometimes my postings are more responsive than others.
That`s part of the fun.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Imax ground plane question Vinnie S. CB 151 April 15th 05 05:21 AM
Testing for gain/loss in an antenna Buck Antenna 7 February 8th 05 05:52 AM
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna RHF Shortwave 1 January 24th 05 09:37 PM
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} RHF Shortwave 23 November 3rd 04 01:38 PM
EH Antenna Revisited Walter Maxwell Antenna 47 January 16th 04 04:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017