| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
April 29th 05, 02:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Harrison wrote:
1 dB is probably good enough for graphs and tables to be comparable in accuracy to the measurements you can make. Of course, everyone wants complete accuracy. I remember asking my college prof back in the '50's: How can we trust a graph where none of the measured values actually fall *on* the graph line? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
| Testing for gain/loss in an antenna | Antenna | |||
| Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
| The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
| EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
