Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank" wrote in message news:VPqbe.902$0X6.797@edtnps90... Thanks again Ed. From everyone of your posts I learn something new. The MIL-STD-461E requirement for absorbed is a 10 dB return loss at 250 MHz. Assume you would test the chamber return loss with a tuned dipole having free space return loss 10dB. Again, the 250 MHz verification of return loss is measured with a horn antenna, typically a double-ridged model like the ARA 2020 or the EMCO 3106. A newer technique is to use ferrite tiles, especially on the floor. They are less than a half-inch thick, and perform much better at low frequencies. And the cost is about $100 / sq ft. I like to think of my walls and ceiling as covered with $5 bills, and the floor carpeted with $10's. Your anechoic chamber is never really perfect; however, it becomes "good enough" when you run out of money. I have heard of the ferrite floor tiles, and are probably a much better solution than inverted pyamids fitted into the floor mounted pyramids. Before I installed the ferrite floor tiles, I had considerable problems with resonances, starting around 7 MHz and continuing through about 150 MHz, associated with the chamber XYZ dimensions. After the ferrite installation, the resonances have nearly disappeared. I did a lot of analysis to figure out what was required, but never got to finish it, on account of being laid-off! Nobody ever seems to want to spend the money to get it right. You can write that on your chamber wall (but management will be ****ed). OK, just for trivia's sake. If the antenna base was cylindrical, painted grey crinkle, had a 6-position range switch and a brown bakelite top insulator, it was an Empire VA-105. Describes it perfectly But, if it was almost a cube, painted battleship grey, had a black front panel and an 8-position range switch, it was a Stoddart 92138-1 (that number is a hazy memory). Both were passive antennas. The Empire was used with the NF-105 receiver, That was the one I used, now you mention it I remember the model number as the NF-105 So you're older than dirt too? g -- Ed WB6WSN El Cajon, CA USA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Testing for gain/loss in an antenna | Antenna | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna |