LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #32   Report Post  
Old April 30th 05, 06:09 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg:

I'm primarily doing the US MIL-STD-461E protocol, on widely varying

test
specimens (hand-held, man-worn, 2-meter tall racks, 2-meter diameter
parabolic tracking antennas), so I am getting my antennas calibrated

for 1 &
3 meter separation distances.

The lab I use has an outdoor range, and I get a Certificate of

Conformance
for each antenna which includes the following statements:

"Test and Measurement Equipment used for performance verification is
calibrated with traceability to the U.S. National Institute of

Standards and
Technology. Inspection records, test data, and other evidence of

conformance
are on file at the sellers facility are are available for inspection

on
request."

They further state a "Calibration Uncertainty of (2 sigma) (+/- 1

dB)" and
reference "SAE ARP-958". I then get a listing of the specific

instruments
used in the generation of my antenna data, along with their

calibration
certificate numbers and the date of each calibration period

expiration.

As for the data, I get a tabulation and a plot. For a typical

antenna (an
EMCO 3115 double-ridged horn covering 1 GHz to 18 GHz), I get a

tabular
array of antenna correction factor, dB return loss, SWR, numeric

gain and
dBi, in 250 MHz step increments, across the range. I also get a

continuous
swept plot of return loss, and from this, I infer that the lab uses

my
unknown antenna as the transmitting element on their range.

This data and the C of C is enough to keep my internal Metrology guy

happy,
and it gives me a sufficiently warm feeling. I have been using the

same
antenna lab for almost 10 years, and I informally track the

calibration data
from year to year on each of my antennas. So far, the data never has

looked
"copied", fudged, or otherwise egregious. However, that may just

mean I'm
easily fooled.
--
Ed
WB6WSN
El Cajon, CA USA


============================================

Much obliged to you Ed for interesting infomation from a reliable
source.

Including 2-Sigma uncertainty limits of +/- 1 dB.

Thanks.
Reg, G4FGQ


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Imax ground plane question Vinnie S. CB 151 April 15th 05 05:21 AM
Testing for gain/loss in an antenna Buck Antenna 7 February 8th 05 05:52 AM
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna RHF Shortwave 1 January 24th 05 09:37 PM
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} RHF Shortwave 23 November 3rd 04 01:38 PM
EH Antenna Revisited Walter Maxwell Antenna 47 January 16th 04 04:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017