Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:08:52 -0700, I.Care wrote:
NASA is funding a new type of wire that can transmit power 10 times better than normal wire. Will this make a difference in Audio? Only to those who sincerely wish while closing their eyes very, very hard. http://www.wired.com/news/space/0,2697,67350,00.html An OK general announcement that is rather a hodge-podge of facts and characteristics. Wired is hardly a cutting edge science venue. One particular howler is the construction of a "quantum wire" from a wrapping of several many nanotubes. This is a contradiction in terms. The nanotubes are already quantum wires, in fact they are called 1D forms. Being "quantum" anything, they are consistent in exhibiting non-linear electrical/physical properties. Ohms law (being yet another model that those who lambaste models would be surprised to learn) fails to uniquely express what resistance this wire would exhibit (Onsager's Relation drawn as a Landauer curve). However in conductance measurements, carbon nanotubes will support a billion Amperes per square centimeter. However, no carbon nanotube is a square centimeter, being more often 10s of nanometers in diameter, they are still not square (area) defined (that "quantum" thingy again). The problem of the article is that it is mixing the bulk carbon nanotube properties with the quantum carbon nanotube properties - not at all the same thing. This is why the conductance of a quantum nanotube wire in billions of Amperes plunges to a rather more mundane 1/10th the resistance of copper for a nanotube bundle. The quantum properties quite rightly dismiss any notion of skin effect, current travels inside the tube. In fact, it also distorts the shape of the tube like a snake swallowing a golf ball. Even more interesting is that current will flow in the opposite direction of the applied EMF if there is a sufficient heat differential between the ends (it doesn't take much heat because carbon nanotubes are exceptionally good heat conductors). Firstly, getting current into a carbon nanotube is not a pretty thing as they exhibit what is called "non-reproducible behavior" by their nature of having a great variety of conduction configurations that all arise out of their binding to a contact material. For nano-conductors, contacts dominate everything. All-in-all, the introduction of a new technology is frequently confused as a better version of an old technology - something like saying facsimile would replace the newspaper - or that the utilities would pay us to use nuclear power. All the "forecasts" mentioned in this article rank right up there with these world class pipe dreams. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is this voltage doubler different? | Homebrew | |||
Two Shortwave Listener (SWL) 10:1 Baluns for Random Wire Antennas | Swap | |||
Newbie SWL question: Antenna geometry | Shortwave | |||
RF filters and Impedance Matching | Homebrew | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave |