Tom Donaly wrote:
You forgot to include "it" in the "he (she)" nomenclature.

How do you think a contraction like "he****"
for he/she/it would go over?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

It would "smell" bad?

Regards,
John

Cecil Moore wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote:

You forgot to include "it" in the "he (she)" nomenclature.


How do you think a contraction like "he****"
for he/she/it would go over?

Poorly.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Cecil Moore wrote:

Tom Donaly wrote:

You forgot to include "it" in the "he (she)" nomenclature.


How do you think a contraction like "he****"
for he/she/it would go over?

HOWL!!!!

He****?


HOWL! Thanks Cecil, I needed that...

- Mike KB3EIA