| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
May 8th 05, 03:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 08 May 2005 00:52:13 GMT, ml wrote:
what i ponder is what if any improvements i might see over the dipole or if under what 'conditions' it might be better --if at all?? Hi Myles, Probably none, or at best, different from the dipole, but only on alternate days (as an average, no difference). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
|
#2
May 8th 05, 05:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Richard Clark wrote: On Sun, 08 May 2005 00:52:13 GMT, ml wrote: what i ponder is what if any improvements i might see over the dipole or if under what 'conditions' it might be better --if at all?? Hi Myles, Probably none, or at best, different from the dipole, but only on alternate days (as an average, no difference). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC hmm tnx for the reply, on one hand i sorta thought that might be the case but at times i wondered if it might not be, ... hope your well m |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Dipole vs. Delta loop vs. Quad loop -pratical experience | Antenna | |||
| Shortwave random-wire antenna question | Shortwave | |||
| 6m vert dipole | Antenna | |||
| 40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
