Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 12 May 2005 00:09:36 -500, "Asimov"
wrote: RC You probably won't unless you have deconvolution math behind it. Would you please, explain? Hi Isaac, The technique is one of a suite of tools derived from Fourier analysis. The background signal contains a random response that is largely immutable. That signal can be used as a key (if we were to use the parlance of cryptography). The signal of interest still appears to be just as random - in isolation. However, when both are "mixed" (if we were to use the idiom of electronics), then the signal of interest rises out of the noise. It is not a simple mixing process, however, because in that idiom we don't know the center frequency - so to speak (and instead of getting clear speech in the typical SSB application we get something that sounds like Donald Duck at best). However, in Fourier analysis, you can slip the two signals past each other (akin to matching the key of the "Gold Code" of a spread spectrum signal to the incoming signal) in what is called cross correlation and the deconvolved signal will spring out as a result (when done with what is called confidence math, also found in the Fourier repertoire). To return to the idiom of the SSB application, the background noise becomes the center frequency. The same application has been done to map the ocean floor using natural wave and wildlife noise. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |