Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old May 29th 05, 10:15 PM
Telamon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Richard Clark wrote:

On Sun, 29 May 2005 08:51:22 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

119 Line response to a 25 line post, and with only 6 lines of new
content.


Snip

He responded to your post that way because you are full of it. Most of
what you posted is either wrong, off topic or unhelpful. Take your
pick.

Just about anyone reading rec.radio.shortwave has connected some wire
to a portable radio and gotten an improvement in being able to hear a
weak signal.

About the only right, on topic comment you made out of a long post was
about signal to noise being most important factor in the receiving
antenna system.

AND...

I'm not somebody's old wife.

I'm not a CB'er.

I have a clear head.

I understand how BALUNs work.

I did not imagine it or indulge in wishful thinking and the improvement
wasn't just by chance.

I'm not waiting to buy a Chinese portable.

I understand the economics of electronic engineering.

Since most of your 119 line post is pure disregard for anyone else's
experience or opinion I may have missed some.

If you can't make a non condescending on topic post then go away please.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #22   Report Post  
Old May 29th 05, 10:37 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Telamon:

Don't take offense to Richard, believe it or not, I have kinda grown to like his banter, do you like Shakespeare? Richard does that to... all joking aside, Richard is ok, he is just different...

But, thanks for your post... I am glad others have "wondered" my "wonders" and experimented as I...

Warmest regards,
John
"Telamon" wrote in message ...
In article ,
Richard Clark wrote:

On Sun, 29 May 2005 08:51:22 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

119 Line response to a 25 line post, and with only 6 lines of new
content.


Snip

He responded to your post that way because you are full of it. Most of
what you posted is either wrong, off topic or unhelpful. Take your
pick.

Just about anyone reading rec.radio.shortwave has connected some wire
to a portable radio and gotten an improvement in being able to hear a
weak signal.

About the only right, on topic comment you made out of a long post was
about signal to noise being most important factor in the receiving
antenna system.

AND...

I'm not somebody's old wife.

I'm not a CB'er.

I have a clear head.

I understand how BALUNs work.

I did not imagine it or indulge in wishful thinking and the improvement
wasn't just by chance.

I'm not waiting to buy a Chinese portable.

I understand the economics of electronic engineering.

Since most of your 119 line post is pure disregard for anyone else's
experience or opinion I may have missed some.

If you can't make a non condescending on topic post then go away please.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #23   Report Post  
Old May 29th 05, 11:20 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 29 May 2005 21:15:15 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

About the only right, on topic comment you made out of a long post was
about signal to noise being most important factor in the receiving
antenna system.


Hi OM,

That was not me, and given that inaccuracy in reporting (says
something doesn't it?) makes the following suspect:

AND...

I'm not somebody's old wife.

I'm not a CB'er.

I have a clear head.

I understand how BALUNs work.

I did not imagine it or indulge in wishful thinking and the improvement
wasn't just by chance.

I'm not waiting to buy a Chinese portable.

I understand the economics of electronic engineering.

Since most of your 119 line post is pure disregard for anyone else's
experience or opinion I may have missed some.


This last comment of course, is prophetic by example with an obvious
negative expectation. ;-)

If you can't make a non condescending on topic post then go away please.


73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #24   Report Post  
Old May 29th 05, 11:33 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You guys are a crack-up, you have others which read this newsgroup, calling me Brett in other newsgroups... I give up, I have began answering to it... grin
I expect anyway now for the FBI to show up at my door with a complete list of aliases I have used in the past and begin an interrogation of me--with lights in my face and rubber hoses--in the back room... grin

.... asking me if I know where Osama is... he's my dad yanno... roflol

Warmest regards,
John
"Bob Miller" wrote in message ...
On Sat, 28 May 2005 21:16:48 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

Boring.


Whatever Brett did to his posting apparatus, the text now falls off
the right edge of the screen (in an Agent reader), requiring back and
forth scrolling to read anything.

bob
k5qwg

  #25   Report Post  
Old May 29th 05, 11:55 PM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default

JS,


  #26   Report Post  
Old May 30th 05, 12:21 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

  #27   Report Post  
Old May 30th 05, 03:21 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

  #28   Report Post  
Old May 30th 05, 03:41 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You don't like the "stationary" waaaaa....
grin

Warmest regards,
John
"Hal Rosser" wrote in message
news I was outdoors with a portable radio -
I happened to walk under one of those telephone-pole guy wires
and the signal increased dramatically.
It increaded more
when I placed the telescoping antenna
on the guy wire.
it was magic

by the way -
you oughta change your do-hickie program
to send text-only
instead of html
to the newsgroup

========
then the script-kiddies wrote a virus in c
it was a fast virus -zoooom
===
====


  #29   Report Post  
Old May 30th 05, 03:42 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael:

What is your disability, why you can't work--mental?

Warmest regards,
John
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...
Hal Rosser wrote:

I was outdoors with a portable radio -
I happened to walk under one of those telephone-pole guy wires
and the signal increased dramatically.
It increaded more
when I placed the telescoping antenna
on the guy wire.
it was magic

by the way -
you oughta change your do-hickie program
to send text-only
instead of html
to the newsgroup

========
then the script-kiddies wrote a virus in c
it was a fast virus -zoooom
===
====



One good thing about his HTML. He uses a tiny font that I can't
see
well enough to read. I guess he's here mouthing off after the way
they
told him off in one of the rec.radio newsgroups.

--
Former professional electron wrangler.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

  #30   Report Post  
Old May 30th 05, 04:32 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Actually, it may be, and it may have had nothing to do with that guy
wire/ground wire you were visually looking at (well, not directly--and
it serving as an antenna)... in the presence of VERY STRONG magnetic
fields, rf fields can be dramatically warped and rf fields bent and
focused... and, it is not uncommon to find hundreds of amps (in some
instances thousands have been recorded), at a very low voltage, around
such poles... but that is a whole different story which has not been
investigated well yet...

Warmest regards,
John
"Hal Rosser" wrote in message
news I was outdoors with a portable radio -
I happened to walk under one of those telephone-pole guy wires
and the signal increased dramatically.
It increaded more
when I placed the telescoping antenna
on the guy wire.
it was magic

by the way -
you oughta change your do-hickie program
to send text-only
instead of html
to the newsgroup

========
then the script-kiddies wrote a virus in c
it was a fast virus -zoooom
===
====


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Choke Balun Impedance Recommendations? MikeN Antenna 0 January 27th 05 03:04 AM
FS:Conar Twins - Conar 500 Receiver & Conar 400 Xmtr Dave Hollander Equipment 0 December 8th 03 02:35 AM
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit Tim Shoppa Equipment 4 September 8th 03 03:20 AM
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit Tim Shoppa Equipment 0 September 6th 03 08:52 PM
FS: Icom R75 Receiver w/DSP David Black Shortwave 0 July 21st 03 10:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017