Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DaveC wrote:
Thanks, Russ, for your observations. If you are OK with linear polarization (is the antenna for WiFi use?), I suspect a biquad would provide better illumination than a cantenna or a patch. Not that the latter two wouldn't work, it's just they aren't optimum for that f/D Yes, WiFi. If need be, can't I just rotate the biquad feed by 90 deg. and get horiz. polarization? Yeah, I see (via net search) that biquad fits nicely with a 0.7 f/D dish. Thanks again, Yes. Just turn the biquad so the one quad is 'on top' of the lower quad and you will have horizonal polarization. The pattern looks pretty symmetrical in both the E and H planes Best of luck |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ford Focus and transciever location? | Equipment | |||
non-directional navigation beacon location techique question | Shortwave | |||
Horizintal loop with two feed points? | Antenna | |||
stuff for all hams | General | |||
70 ohm dipole to 50 ohm feed line question | Antenna |