Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
the more and the longer the better of course! the perfect situation is an
infinite perfectly conducting plane. failing that it is up to you to figure out how much wire you can suspend and how long you can make it. keep in mind that the highest current density for the return currents (and hence the most chance for losses) is near the base of the vertical, so a good screen in close is a good investment. under my 80m elevated 4-square i have one elevated radial that is 1/4 wave, but then under it on the ground i have 150' of 4' wide 2x4 galvanized fence in a cross pattern (100' from the center of the 4-square radially out under each vertical then a 50' piece at 90 degrees to that one under each vertical.). under my 160m raised inverted L's i have 8 radials that are about 1/4 wave long. both of these work well, though if i was being a perfectionist and thought i could keep more wire in the air i would add more. "K4ia" wrote in message news:aAApe.28651$iU.5809@lakeread05... I believe the length of buried radials is not that critical (bigger/more = better) and one size fits all bands. Within reason, subject to all the normal caveats, etc. But what about elevated radials? Does anyone know Hustler's recommendation for elevated radials on their BTV series of verticals? I suspect they want a pair of "tuned" radials on each band when elevated because that is what I have always seen. I am curious what Hustler says and what the group opines. k4ia Buck Fredericksburg, VA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
physical 1/4, electrical 1/2 wavelength | Antenna | |||
Radial Wire Antennas - by Peter Chambers | Shortwave | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |