Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy:
My "bumbling goof-abouts" with antennas has proven to me you are once again right on the money... I have gotten to where I don't even worry about the loss of a well constructed choking--balun/unun in the circuit--better to be safe than sorry... John "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Modeing shows that radiating current can occur on a J-Pole feedline due to mutual coupling from the antenna. The amount depends heavily on the length and orientation of the feedline. The main effect of the current on the pattern is to distort the main lobe, reducing the amount of signal directed horizontally. I suspect that the widely varying reports on the effectiveness of a J-Pole are due, in part, at least, to different feedline lengths and orientations and therefore different amounts of feedline radiation. If there is significant current on the feedline, it might take a couple of current (choke) baluns, placed about a quarter wave apart, to reduce it to a small value. Most people don't realize that ground plane antennas are subject to the same phenomenon. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Larry wrote: ml wrote: second I have a arrow 2/440 j pole works great---- it dosn't have any radials hanging off naturally, so since basically just the center conductor is connected would you suspect my coax shield is 'part of the antenna' radiating alot of stuff?? (course the shield does attach to the bottom mounting plate of the antenna but i wasn't counting that In the typical J-pole antenna, the shield connects to the long element and the center to the stub. I don't know your antenna in particular, but I would suspect this is the case and don't believe it is considered a radiating element. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have gotten to where I don't even worry about the loss of a well
constructed choking--balun/unun in the circuit--better to be safe than sorry... If the decoupling is designed into the antenna, using cones, bells, sleeves, etc, there is little if any loss. Being as the feed radiation skews the pattern up off the horizon, adding decoupling usually ends up with a "gain" at that low angle. Also, I've heard different types of "J" feed methods, naturally decouple better than others..This also applies to the ringo's, etc. The gamma loop matching device on a ringo does a halfway job of decoupling the line, but it can always be improved by a 2nd decoupling section. I don't use conventional ferrite chokes when decoupling VHF/UHF antennas. IE: If I were to add additional decoupling to a ground plane, I would use a 2nd set of radials, or a sleeve, vs a ferrite choke. MK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|